| 1 |
On Monday 20 August 2012 10:54:03 Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> I agree with your point. I'm fine with setting deadlines and such, |
| 5 |
> >> but my main concern is that the first deadline shouldn't be two days |
| 6 |
> >> after it is announced. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > The tracker has been open since July 4th. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Yes, and it does not contain any deadlines at all (not even the one |
| 11 |
> announced on the mailing list). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
glibc is on a known release period (~every 6 months). i posted some time ago |
| 14 |
that Gentoo will be rolling along as well: |
| 15 |
- have a version in the stable pipeline |
| 16 |
- have a version in the unstable pipeline |
| 17 |
- have a version in the masked pipeline |
| 18 |
as versions in the lower pipeline clear out, the next one will be moving into |
| 19 |
place. so while exact times haven't been posted (because i don't have them), |
| 20 |
glibc versions will continue to be released, so maintainers can't sit on their |
| 21 |
bugs. 2.15 has gone stable which means there's now room for 2.16 which has |
| 22 |
largely settled down. |
| 23 |
-mike |
Archives