1 |
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 11:45:36AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
2 |
> > As Weeve said, he's still trying to get people to stop breaking SPARC |
3 |
> > keywords, just like 3 years ago. It's just when trying to do anything |
4 |
> > larger than a single project that you run into issues. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> People that do this sort of thing should have some sort of consequences. |
7 |
> The occasional accident is one thing, but there are people that become |
8 |
> "repeat offenders" with many of these sorts of issues, yet nothing is |
9 |
> done to them. If there's no consequences, why should they bother |
10 |
> changing their behavior? |
11 |
|
12 |
From the new conflict resolution policy (found at |
13 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~plasmaroo/policy.xml, will move to some more |
14 |
official place soon): |
15 |
|
16 |
--snip-- |
17 |
Issues not necessarily related to personal conflict, such as |
18 |
intentional or repeated policy breaches, malicious or abrasive |
19 |
behavior to users or developers, or similar developer-specific |
20 |
behavioral problems should be brought directly to Developer Relations |
21 |
via devrel@g.o. These should be dealt with on a case-by-case |
22 |
basis by Developer Relations and may require disciplinary action. |
23 |
--snip-- |
24 |
|
25 |
So if by breaking the keyword someone breaks a policy, it is something |
26 |
devrel should and will deal with. |
27 |
|
28 |
cheers, |
29 |
Wernfried |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org |
33 |
Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org |
34 |
IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo dot org |