Archives
Archives
| From: | Gordon Pettey <petteyg359@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification | ||
| Date: | Sat, 12 Aug 2017 14:55:48 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAHY5MefnVF+xt2QDcq0se5WaXRLG9EmUSyoUXY=BfH8PPQs06Q@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification by Alexander Berntsen |
||
| 1 | On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o> |
| 2 | wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > While the PMS perhaps hasn't been an unequivocal success, it's still a |
| 5 | > good effort with some success. I would be disappointed to see the |
| 6 | > proposed change, and view it as a bad sign for Gentoo. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Also, how many Portages are there that need to be managed with a "Portage |
| 10 | Manager"? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification | "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> |