1 |
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:05:54 +0300 |
2 |
Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Not before someone has implemented an alternative way to avoid useless |
5 |
> rebuilding. |
6 |
> The quality of the distribution doesn't improve by killing one of the |
7 |
> most important |
8 |
> features the package manager has. |
9 |
> The quality of the distribution improves by providing an alternative |
10 |
> with less problems. |
11 |
|
12 |
Those are apples with eggs; what you claim to be most important in |
13 |
itself also has problems as stated in this thread, it doesn't stop there |
14 |
as even beyond that it is a hack that deals with triggered problems. So, |
15 |
I don't think it is right to discuss replacing problems with problems. |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
With kind regards, |
19 |
|
20 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
21 |
Gentoo Developer |
22 |
|
23 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
24 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
25 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |