| 1 |
On 22/07/14 10:25, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 7/21/14, 11:52 PM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: |
| 3 |
>> 2. Remove dynamic-deps. This is what I think currently makes sense. |
| 4 |
> +1 I also think it's the best option. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Not before someone has implemented an alternative way to avoid useless |
| 9 |
rebuilding. |
| 10 |
The quality of the distribution doesn't improve by killing one of the |
| 11 |
most important |
| 12 |
features the package manager has. |
| 13 |
The quality of the distribution improves by providing an alternative |
| 14 |
with less problems. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Sounds like to me, that the people who want to remove the feature so |
| 17 |
badly, are the |
| 18 |
ones volunteering for the job as well. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
- Samuli |
Archives