| 1 |
On Friday 03 March 2006 18:14, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 2 |
> If we're going to do this, then at least we should be implementing a |
| 3 |
> consistent standard across all ebuilds. F.ex, when SSL and TLS |
| 4 |
> conflict, we should have a standard saying that all ebuilds will |
| 5 |
> consistenly favour one over the other. That's much more deterministic |
| 6 |
> than having some ebuilds prefer SSL, and others prefer TLS (for |
| 7 |
> example). |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
bad idea ... choosing a default is a per-package issue. say we take this path |
| 10 |
and we declare that if a package supports both tls and ssl, you must utilize |
| 11 |
tls over ssl regardless. then you come to a package has really shitty tls |
| 12 |
support but it has wonderful ssl support. you're saying that defaulting to |
| 13 |
tls is a better idea than ssl ? a global decision like this just wont cut |
| 14 |
it. |
| 15 |
-mike |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives