Archives
Archives
| From: | "Santiago M. Mola" <coldwind@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-print/cups: ChangeLog cups-1.3.4-r1.ebuild cups-1.3.4.ebuild | ||
| Date: | Sat, 10 Nov 2007 15:25:58 | ||
| Message-Id: | 3c32af40711100721l69f94a6bwda3dc9d17fed3c80@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-print/cups: ChangeLog cups-1.3.4-r1.ebuild cups-1.3.4.ebuild by "Rémi Cardona" |
||
| 1 | On Nov 9, 2007 12:08 PM, Rémi Cardona <remi@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > Either way, those are just runtime deps. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > Wouldn't it be best to drop them from the ebuild and add an einfo |
| 6 | > printing out this list of possible driver packages and let users decide |
| 7 | > which one they are going to use? |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Are they inconditional runtime deps? This looks like another case |
| 11 | where RECOMMENDS would be useful. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Santiago M. Mola |