| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh a écrit : |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 00:13:39 -0800 |
| 3 |
> Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> PDEPEND=" |
| 5 |
>>> ppds? ( || ( |
| 6 |
>>> ( |
| 7 |
>>> net-print/foomatic-filters-ppds |
| 8 |
>>> net-print/foomatic-db-ppds |
| 9 |
>>> ) |
| 10 |
>>> net-print/foomatic-filters-ppds |
| 11 |
>>> net-print/foomatic-db-ppds |
| 12 |
>>> net-print/hplip |
| 13 |
>>> media-gfx/gimp-print |
| 14 |
>>> net-print/foo2zjs |
| 15 |
>>> net-print/cups-pdf |
| 16 |
>>> ) ) |
| 17 |
>> I'm not sure I understand this dep. Either these two packages, or |
| 18 |
>> these two packages and a lot more? When would the second one ever |
| 19 |
>> happen? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Looks like it's a silly hack that relies upon the resolver taking the |
| 22 |
> first available option if nothing's installed. So if the user already |
| 23 |
> has any one of the listed packages, it does nothing, otherwise it |
| 24 |
> installs the two in their own block. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Which is rather perverse, and doesn't have the desired effect anyway, |
| 27 |
> since one of the listed options could well be pulled in as an earlier |
| 28 |
> dep anyway, in which case the pair wouldn't be chosen even if the user |
| 29 |
> previously had none of those packages. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Either way, those are just runtime deps. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Wouldn't it be best to drop them from the ebuild and add an einfo |
| 35 |
printing out this list of possible driver packages and let users decide |
| 36 |
which one they are going to use? |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Rémi |
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives