Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy-level discussion for minimum versions on dependencies
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:49:05
Message-Id: 1383752934.23332.4.camel@localhost
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Policy-level discussion for minimum versions on dependencies by Ian Stakenvicius
1 On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 10:15 -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
2 > However, it's been a long-standing general practise that if there are
3 > no deps in the tree older than what is necessary for a package, that
4 > package doesn't need to have a minimum version on the dependency atom.
5 > As such, issues similar to this are probably lying in wait all other
6 > the place in the tree.
7
8 this is a common misconception: ebuilds must have min. deps matching
9 their requirements (exactly because of this problem)
10
11 it can be fixed on the user side by 'emerge -uDN world' meanwhile but
12 this doesn't mean the ebuild doesn't have a bug, even if minor
13
14 Alexis.

Replies