| 1 |
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 21:47:42 +0100 |
| 2 |
Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:46:43 +0100 |
| 5 |
> Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > It allows undermanned arch teams to prioritize |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Oh, so you're still assuming an understaffed team somehow manages |
| 10 |
> to do some work in an appropriate time frame. It's getting old. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Apparently "understaffed" isn't the right word since it keeps tripping |
| 13 |
> you up. How about "abandoned"? "Overburdened"? "Inactive" maybe? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
The indication of these meanings are underivable from the context of |
| 16 |
the problem; for what we know, some bugs out of all of them linger in |
| 17 |
the stabilization queue. That leads to the generic perception of the |
| 18 |
arch teams being "understaffed", anything beyond that are assumptions; |
| 19 |
less common, these assumptions exist in a non-generic way. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
With kind regards, |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 25 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 28 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 29 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives