Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From:	Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
To:	gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject:	Re: Assigning keyword/stable bugs to arch teams (WAS: [gentoo-dev] dropping redundant stable keywords)
Date:	Mon, 17 Feb 2014 20:47:56
Message-Id:	`20140217214742.11d77782@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net`
In Reply to:	Re: Assigning keyword/stable bugs to arch teams (WAS: [gentoo-dev] dropping redundant stable keywords) by Tom Wijsman

1	On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:46:43 +0100
2	Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote:
3
4	> It allows undermanned arch teams to prioritize
5
6	Oh, so you're still assuming an understaffed team somehow manages
7	to do some work in an appropriate time frame. It's getting old.
8
9	Apparently "understaffed" isn't the right word since it keeps tripping
10	you up. How about "abandoned"? "Overburdened"? "Inactive" maybe?
11
12
13	jer

Subject	Author
Re: Assigning keyword/stable bugs to arch teams (WAS: [gentoo-dev] dropping redundant stable keywords)	Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>