| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Friday 19 March 2004 02:21, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 03:42, Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 6 |
> > My opinion: I'm for a common prefix, but I don't like the gentoo- part. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Seconded. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> Given that many of Gentoo's tools start with e* already, perhaps |
| 11 |
> econfig-* and eupdate-* would be a better idea. This keeps the shorter |
| 12 |
> length while still being very obviously a Gentoo tool. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Also seconded. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> The downside is that "e<tab><tab>" still gets you a huge list of bins, |
| 17 |
> while "gentoo-<tab<tab>" gets you _only_ the tools. You need to type |
| 18 |
> "econfig-" and "eupdate-" on different terms at the same time to get the |
| 19 |
> ease of searchability the gentoo- prefix gives. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Comments? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
eco<tab><tab> gave me nothing |
| 24 |
eup<tab><tab> gave me eupdatedb |
| 25 |
gent<tab><tab> gave me nothing (gen gave completely unrelated commands) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
So if we count it up: |
| 28 |
gent<tab>u<tab> at 7 keys and 13 chars |
| 29 |
eup<tab> at 4 keys and 7 chars |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
And for some noise, this idea seems more aesthetically appealing to me. :) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Regards, |
| 34 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 35 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 36 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
iQCVAwUBQFne8loikN4/5jfsAQKfaQP/XWTTnahpLtEVn0eELZ9Dmggf5n8n8jBz |
| 39 |
kunM22uPhyp0rukkoVBMDaN0GHtjk8EwUT5jSLaEgPc/qsKU6yplPcBGMVub61bv |
| 40 |
s+bQ+xxou3L9BFbkzyAyU7p0CS3rTw9XZJ+UQfD5eCEGF9jDOLLM2a1XNdx3VmRw |
| 41 |
n16ZztdvFW0= |
| 42 |
=XxTH |
| 43 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-- |
| 46 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives