Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: .la files and their future on Gentoo
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 11:29:00
Message-Id: 1286278111.6591.745.camel@yamato.local
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: .la files and their future on Gentoo by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
1 Il giorno mar, 05/10/2010 alle 13.25 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò ha
2 scritto:
3 > Definitely not from /usr/lib/libGL.la given that libGL is part of mesa
4 > and mesa did not use libtool for linking until very recently,
5
6 Actually, scratch that, mesa IS NOT USING LIBTOOL AT ALL.
7
8 So you hit the jackpot: you brought up a libtool use case that... does
9 not use libtool at all! Congratulations!
10
11 Now, can you please let people express _informed_ opinions?
12
13 --
14 Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes”
15 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
16
17 If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is,
18 it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: .la files and their future on Gentoo Angelo Arrifano <miknix@g.o>