Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: vim@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 05:00:02
Message-Id: 1496379586.1537.0.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax by "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov"
1 On pią, 2017-06-02 at 04:56 +0700, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
2 > 1) Dear Vim Team, can we hear your opinions?
3 >
4 > 2) I'd like to know if discussion participants really differs my eselect-php-
5 > like suggestion (where all scripts goes to another directory, controlled by
6 > neither of vims, and then users should/can manually dis-/enable modules for
7 > each of vim they want) from Ciaran's suggestion of making a directory common
8 > for all vims, patch all the vims, and force *developers* to check modules and
9 > put them there only after check modules under both (currently) vims (as side
10 > effect leave neovim users without modules until developers finaly finish that
11 > work).
12 >
13 > And what point they (participants) really supports?
14
15 Just FYI, I'm strongly against eselect modules (and any user code) that
16 writes into /usr (except for /usr/local). This directory should be
17 reserved for package manager control, and files in it should be
18 registered in vdb.
19
20 >
21 > 3) Again, dear Vim Team, please come here, and take a part in the discussion.
22 >
23
24 --
25 Best regards,
26 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" <gentoo@×××.name>