| 1 |
On 20.6.2013 16.07, Matthew Thode wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 06/20/2013 07:49 AM, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 20.6.2013 14.01, Matthew Thode wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 06/20/2013 03:39 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody eventually |
| 6 |
>>>> graduates from kindergarten :-) |
| 7 |
>>>> And perhaps introduce a "culture-fit" score in the recruiting, |
| 8 |
>>>> mentoring process. |
| 9 |
>>>> |
| 10 |
>>> As an employee that works for a company that requires a culture fit |
| 11 |
>>> (very important to us). This helps a ton. |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> Sounds good in theory but how do you calculate that score? In companies |
| 15 |
>> there's much more interactions that allow to accumulate information for |
| 16 |
>> such things. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> Regards, |
| 19 |
>> Petteri |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
> We do it during the interview process. I kinda think the best analog we |
| 22 |
> can do is to watch both before and during the probation period to see |
| 23 |
> how well they fit. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
That's already part of the process. What we can improve is that I don't |
| 27 |
remember mentors reporting back on problems during the probation period. |
| 28 |
Maybe automate that in some way so the mentors get emails and should |
| 29 |
respond. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Petteri |
Archives