| 1 |
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:41:04PM +0100, John Nilsson wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 03:12, Greg KH wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 08:04:25PM +0100, John Nilsson wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > If you settle for reiser4 or such fs one could store all settings as |
| 5 |
> > > single files in a tree much like /proc/sys this tree could then be |
| 6 |
> > > exposed as an xml or other format for backward compatibility through |
| 7 |
> > > filsystem plugins... |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > And you want to reinvent gconf for what reason? :) |
| 10 |
> > greg k-h |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> http://cda.mrs.umn.edu/~mine0057/fs.pdf |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Heh, my main point is that reiser4 is not here today, will not be here |
| 15 |
tomorrow, and will not be in wide use next month. Next year it will |
| 16 |
only have a very small installed base, if any. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
You need to do something fs independant, much like gconf does :) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I sure don't understand why sysfs was mentioned in that paper, but it is |
| 21 |
cool to see it get popular... |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
thanks, |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
greg k-h |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives