Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild life cycle review
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 10:05:41
Message-Id: 20200416220526.47163a7f@katipo2.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild life cycle review by Samuel Bernardo
1 On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 21:41:58 +0100
2 Samuel Bernardo <samuelbernardo.mail@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > loosing ebuilds (we
5 > wants it!... we needs it must!... my precious)
6
7 Ebuilds are never actually "lost".
8
9 If you use gentoo's git repo for /usr/portage, you can always wind back
10 the whole tree, or some subset thereof, to a state where the ebuild
11 existed.
12
13 It won't be well maintained, but that's the compromise one pays for.
14
15 ( You don't even have to use git for /usr/portage if you don't want to,
16 you can do what I do occasionally and have an otherwise empty overlay
17 with symlinks to a copy of gentoo.git at the desired point )