| 1 |
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 16:49 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 16 May 2009 17:43:32 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Tobias Klausmann <klausman@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > That doesn't let us do version format changes. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Or are we talking about the *ebuild* versions? I see that as |
| 7 |
> > different matter. Plus: You could change the version format with |
| 8 |
> > the changed extension. I sure do hope there are no plans on |
| 9 |
> > making those changes as often as new EAPIs. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Yes, those. The current rules include some pointless arbitrary |
| 12 |
> restrictions that are only there for historical reasons and that mean |
| 13 |
> people have to mess with convoluted MY_PV things. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
So from all the debate that's going on, the current major issue seems to |
| 16 |
be being able to support '-scm' as per GLEP-54. What other restrictions |
| 17 |
in the version format are you referring to? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- Arun |
Archives