| 1 |
Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ok, as there is currently a lot of work going on for GLEP 23 |
| 3 |
> (licese based visibility filtering aka ACCEPT_LICENSE) the topic of |
| 4 |
> license groups came up, in particular the way how they should be |
| 5 |
> (technically) defined. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> The simplest way is a line based format |
| 8 |
> <groupname> <license1> ... <licenseN> |
| 9 |
> however this doesn't allow for any addition of metadata (for example |
| 10 |
> descriptions to explain the purpose of a group), these (if wanted) would |
| 11 |
> have to be defined in another file. The alternative would be to use a |
| 12 |
> more complex file format, for example so called ini-style |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> [groupname] |
| 15 |
> licenses=license1 license2 ... licenseN |
| 16 |
> description=Sample license group |
| 17 |
> constains_stupid_licenses=1 |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Some way to express metadata makes sense, but ini-style doesn't fit in |
| 20 |
with any existing configuration format portage (in the broader sense, |
| 21 |
not the sys-apps/portage sense) uses (make.conf, metadata.xml, etc) -- |
| 22 |
does it? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Thanks, |
| 25 |
Donnie |
Archives