| 1 |
On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 03:49:30 +1100 |
| 2 |
Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 28/12/16 20:57, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>>>>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2016, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> >> with the great and awesome work of Michael Palimaka (kensington) and |
| 8 |
> >> the support of the wg-stable, for the stabilization process, some |
| 9 |
> >> changes on our bugzilla have been done. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Thank you for the great work. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> >> [...] |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> >> When you will choose one of those, you will see two new fields: |
| 16 |
> >> - Atoms to stabilize |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Can you please avoid reintroducing the term "atom" there, when we are |
| 19 |
> > trying to get rid of it elsewhere [1]? Note that PMS doesn't define |
| 20 |
> > the term [2]. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Any suggestions for improved text? Ideally it would be |
| 23 |
> stabilisation/keywording agnostic as the same field is used in both |
| 24 |
> components. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
How about: package versions? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Best regards, |
| 30 |
Michał Górny |
| 31 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives