| 1 |
On Sat, 5 May 2007 16:10:39 -0500 |
| 2 |
»Q« <boxcars@×××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
> In <news:200705052250.26106.expose@×××××××××××.net>, |
| 4 |
> expose@×××××××××××.net wrote: |
| 5 |
> > I bet there are other users around, who think a config file format |
| 6 |
> > change that doesnt break anything but produce warnings in the first |
| 7 |
> > place is non-critical. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I'm another one. I guess someone needs to decide whether the |
| 10 |
> criterion is 'critical' or 'important'; there seems to be confusion |
| 11 |
> about the intent and wording of GLEP 42. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Are you a Paludis user who thinks that and who knows what news item |
| 14 |
delivery looks like? If you aren't, you won't see the news item. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives