| 1 |
On 19 Apr 2016 04:02, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 4/19/16 1:41 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > i waited until the known bugs died down. i don't have access to a |
| 4 |
> > tinderbox system myself. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> you didn't notice that coreutils and systemd/udev/eudev broke? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
i had pushed the coreutils issue upstream, but i thought it was fixed |
| 9 |
already (via configure checks). i don't run those other packages. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> but a heads up would have been useful |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
certainly. i usually do it based on how much on an impat a change |
| 14 |
will have. i didn't think this would spawn as many bugs as it had |
| 15 |
(since the incoming rate had slowed/stopped), but i misjudged. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> > not today, but as i said, we want to move multiple libraries (at least |
| 18 |
> > glibc, uClibc, musl, and bionic) in that direction. the current behavior |
| 19 |
> > violates the POSIX standard. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> i took a look at opengroup.org and it seems posix is silent on the |
| 22 |
> matter. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
POSIX does not permit sys/types.h inclusion to export things it doesn't |
| 25 |
define. since it doesn't define major/minor/makedev, including them in |
| 26 |
the export is a standards violation. |
| 27 |
-mike |
Archives