| 1 |
On 4/19/16 1:41 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> i waited until the known bugs died down. i don't have access to a |
| 4 |
> tinderbox system myself. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
you didn't notice that coreutils and systemd/udev/eudev broke? anyhow, |
| 7 |
i don't think this whole affair is as bad as i first did, its an easy |
| 8 |
fix to pkgs. but a heads up would have been useful. you don't need a |
| 9 |
full tinderbox run for glibc upgrades, just a complete rebuild of |
| 10 |
@system in a stage3 chroot on amd64 is probably enough. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> not today, but as i said, we want to move multiple libraries (at least |
| 14 |
> glibc, uClibc, musl, and bionic) in that direction. the current behavior |
| 15 |
> violates the POSIX standard. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
i took a look at opengroup.org and it seems posix is silent on the |
| 19 |
matter. i might have missed something though. musl which is sticks |
| 20 |
pretty close to standards includes major/minor/makedev in sys/types. but |
| 21 |
guards it behind _GNU_SOURCE or _BSD_SOURE. i don't know what |
| 22 |
glibc-2.23 did with types.h and sysmacros.h (did they just drop it |
| 23 |
hard?), but proceeding as musl did doesn't seem unreasonable to me. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 28 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 29 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 30 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
| 31 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |
Archives