Archives
Archives
| From: | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Migrate to Phabricator | ||
| Date: | Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:45:05 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAATnKFBZVBqe3j8kRKTZAu-y0e-LYXWBpN7BtD6uwjtu06h-eg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Migrate to Phabricator by Kristian Fiskerstrand |
||
| 1 | On 19 April 2016 at 01:19, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > References: |
| 3 | > [0] |
| 4 | > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/f74961c953d5ffedd1af9a67fdda6407 |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Based on the comments in this thread, I'd say I was not entirely |
| 8 | unfounded in being pessimistic. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Two trends struck out at me, and assuming everything mentioned ( or |
| 11 | linked in the related GHC entry[0] ) is still true: |
| 12 | |
| 13 | - Anything that requires the use of the `arc` tool is a big "no" from me. |
| 14 | - And the indications are you need to use "specific magic" in commit |
| 15 | messages in order to make it "work", which is another big "no" from |
| 16 | me. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | [0] https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/WhyNotPhabricator |
| 20 | |
| 21 | -- |
| 22 | Kent |
| 23 | |
| 24 | KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Migrate to Phabricator | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> |