| 1 |
On 04/18/2016 03:10 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 18 April 2016 at 23:44, Jonas Jelten <jj@××××××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> especially to dump bugzilla. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> If there was a way for somebody to informally set up a phabricator |
| 9 |
> instance in a non-committal manner that could be used merely for |
| 10 |
> review purposes, that'd be nice. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Indeed, kensington already did some experimentation on this this a |
| 13 |
while back[0], but I'm not sure what what lessons were learned from it. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
My personal 2c is that there is a very big difference between a |
| 16 |
read-only review tool and something more deeply integrates when |
| 17 |
considering security. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
References: |
| 20 |
[0] |
| 21 |
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/f74961c953d5ffedd1af9a67fdda6407 |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 24 |
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 25 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
Archives