1 |
On 02/02/16 23:36, Ryan Hill wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:08:28 +0100 |
3 |
> Justin Lecher <jlec@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> while tracking down the following error when running "egencache" |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> GENTOO.GIT//eclass/wxwidgets.eclass: line 84: get_libdir: command not found |
8 |
>> GENTOO.GIT//eclass/wxwidgets.eclass: line 84: get_libdir: command not found |
9 |
>> GENTOO.GIT//eclass/wxwidgets.eclass: line 84: get_libdir: command not found |
10 |
>> GENTOO.GIT//eclass/wxwidgets.eclass: line 84: get_libdir: command not found |
11 |
>> GENTOO.GIT//eclass/wxwidgets.eclass: line 84: get_libdir: command not found |
12 |
>> GENTOO.GIT//eclass/wxwidgets.eclass: line 84: get_libdir: command not found |
13 |
>> GENTOO.GIT//eclass/wxwidgets.eclass: line 84: get_libdir: command not found |
14 |
>> GENTOO.GIT//eclass/wxwidgets.eclass: line 84: get_libdir: command not found |
15 |
>> GENTOO.GIT//eclass/wxwidgets.eclass: line 84: get_libdir: command not found |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> I found that the global scope get_libdir() usage of the wxwidgets.eclass |
18 |
>> doens't work on EAPI=6. The following patches correct some minor things |
19 |
>> and block EAPI=6 for now until the eclass is ready. |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>> Justin Lecher (5): |
22 |
>> wxwidgets.eclass: Update Copyright year |
23 |
>> wxwidgets.eclass: Fix whitespaces |
24 |
>> wxwidgets.eclass: unset unneeded variables in global scope after usage |
25 |
>> wxwidgets.eclass: Only inherit eclass ones |
26 |
>> wxwidgets.eclass: Add EAPI support |
27 |
>> |
28 |
>> eclass/wxwidgets.eclass | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- |
29 |
>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) |
30 |
>> |
31 |
> |
32 |
> 1. I don't think most of this is necessary but go ahead I guess. |
33 |
|
34 |
Most of them are trivial, but excluding EAPI=6 from supported EAPIs is |
35 |
essential. The usage of get_libdir needs to be moved to a phase |
36 |
function. Which should perhaps be coupled with an env variable which is |
37 |
checked in the later function to ensure the phase function has been run. |
38 |
|
39 |
> 2. When did we start posting every @&#$! eclass change to g-dev? File a bug |
40 |
> like a normal person. (There's already one open you could have used) |
41 |
|
42 |
I feel pretty "normal" when sending eclass changes to g-dev. Having code |
43 |
reviewed which influences a larger number of packages at once in the |
44 |
most public and open way is something we should strive for, isn't it? |