1 |
Pete Gavin wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 07:43:07AM +0100, Achim Gottinger wrote: |
4 |
> > > They're |
5 |
> > > only there to reduce the amount of duplicated code between the |
6 |
> > > hundreds of utilities that are included in the package. I don't know |
7 |
> > > of any packages that link to these libraries, and no header files are |
8 |
> > > installed by netpbm, so I don't know how you could get the prototypes |
9 |
> > > for the functions in the libraries anyways... And imagemagick provides |
10 |
> > > libraries, but its in media-gfx... |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > I thought we disscussed the media-libs issue. We will change it but for now |
13 |
> > I |
14 |
> > think we should place such stuff to media-libs because the other image libs |
15 |
> > are in there too. |
16 |
> > True imagemagick and gimp provide libs too but in opposit to netpbm they |
17 |
> > offer a GUI interface |
18 |
> > that's why they are in media-gfx. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Ok, I'm gonna remove media-gfx/netpbm, but I'd like to make my version |
22 |
> netpbm-9.10-r2, since I put the extra data stuff in /usr/share/netpbm, |
23 |
> rather than /usr/lib/netpbm, since its just data and not executable |
24 |
> stuff. And the Makefile.config for r1 doesn't give all the proper |
25 |
> paths for the include files and libraries for libpng, jpeg, & tiff. Is |
26 |
> that ok w/ you? |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
Yes please. |
30 |
|
31 |
achim~ |
32 |
|
33 |
> |
34 |
> Pete |
35 |
> |
36 |
> _______________________________________________ |
37 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
38 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
39 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |