| 1 |
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 07:43:07AM +0100, Achim Gottinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> > They're |
| 3 |
> > only there to reduce the amount of duplicated code between the |
| 4 |
> > hundreds of utilities that are included in the package. I don't know |
| 5 |
> > of any packages that link to these libraries, and no header files are |
| 6 |
> > installed by netpbm, so I don't know how you could get the prototypes |
| 7 |
> > for the functions in the libraries anyways... And imagemagick provides |
| 8 |
> > libraries, but its in media-gfx... |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I thought we disscussed the media-libs issue. We will change it but for now |
| 11 |
> I |
| 12 |
> think we should place such stuff to media-libs because the other image libs |
| 13 |
> are in there too. |
| 14 |
> True imagemagick and gimp provide libs too but in opposit to netpbm they |
| 15 |
> offer a GUI interface |
| 16 |
> that's why they are in media-gfx. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Ok, I'm gonna remove media-gfx/netpbm, but I'd like to make my version |
| 20 |
netpbm-9.10-r2, since I put the extra data stuff in /usr/share/netpbm, |
| 21 |
rather than /usr/lib/netpbm, since its just data and not executable |
| 22 |
stuff. And the Makefile.config for r1 doesn't give all the proper |
| 23 |
paths for the include files and libraries for libpng, jpeg, & tiff. Is |
| 24 |
that ok w/ you? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Pete |
Archives