1 |
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 07:26:49AM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote: |
2 |
> > What it seems like you're doing here is saying more work for the |
3 |
> > developers is fine, if it makes things easier for the users. (Developers |
4 |
> > will just cvs up, which is likely faster than dealing with a web interface.) |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I dunno if it's really big work to have a look at one site to see if |
7 |
> there are ebuilds you missed when they were updated. |
8 |
> It was not my intention to make really more work. It was just to find a faster |
9 |
> way for outdated ebuilds getting updated. |
10 |
|
11 |
If it is difficult for the users, maybe it needs to be documented |
12 |
better. Might be as simple as a "Report old ebuild" links on the |
13 |
Bugzilla homepage. Somehow I don't think it is all that difficult |
14 |
though. |
15 |
|
16 |
To make a clean separation for other Bugzilla content a new |
17 |
Component may be added. This should ease an searching issues as long |
18 |
as the users searching are aware of the new component. But then we'd |
19 |
probably still see a bunch of confused, headless chickens running |
20 |
around squaking "ebuilds, old ebuilds". |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
David Stanek |
24 |
www.roninds.net |
25 |
|
26 |
GPG keyID #6272EDAF on http://pgp.mit.edu |
27 |
Key fingerprint = 8BAA 7E11 8856 E148 6833 655A 92E2 3E00 6272 EDAF |