1 |
Apologies if this has been answered elsewhere, but is ppc64 considered |
2 |
an 'officially supported' architecture. As such a distinction occurs for |
3 |
other architectures, I'm just curious. |
4 |
|
5 |
Thanks, |
6 |
Mike |
7 |
(Obz) |
8 |
|
9 |
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 21:50, Brad House wrote: |
10 |
> We DEFINATELY need ppc64!!!! |
11 |
> ppc64 is a 64bit kernel and 64bit userland |
12 |
> What ppc does is a 32bit kernel and a 32bit userland |
13 |
> What sparc64 does is a 64bit kernel and a 32bit userland |
14 |
> What sparc does is a 32bit kernel and a 32bit userland |
15 |
> See the main difference here, it's all in the userlands man! |
16 |
> |
17 |
> If anyone removes ppc64 keywords, I will personally lynch you. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> -Brad |
20 |
> |
21 |
> > maybe i'm lost with this but is there any reason we need ppc64 ? |
22 |
> > couldnt something be done with ppc/ppc64 like the sparc/sparc64 merge ? |
23 |
> > -mike |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > -- |
27 |
> > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> |
32 |
> |
33 |
> -- |
34 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
35 |
> |
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |