| 1 |
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 06:12:54AM +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 05/22/2017 03:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since they |
| 5 |
> >> were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev maintainer in |
| 6 |
> >> metadata) they are the de facto maintainers, and overrule everything else. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Just to clarify, the Proxy Maintainers project is not required to be |
| 9 |
> > added to all packages maintained by non-Gentoo maintainers. If a Gentoo |
| 10 |
> > developer is willing to work with and proxy commits for maintainer(s) |
| 11 |
> > without commit access, Proxy Maintainers are happy to be removed. There |
| 12 |
> > are several metadata.xml's in the tree with examples, including a few |
| 13 |
> > for which you are one of the maintainers. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> That's nice. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Could proxy-maint as a team maybe try to agree on such things so that |
| 18 |
> everyone is on the same page? It's a tiny bit annoying when the actions |
| 19 |
> of some contradict the suggested rules of others, while appearing as a |
| 20 |
> single team to the outside ... |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I suspect it's likely a misunderstanding - without notification, all |
| 23 |
anyone from Proxy Maint sees is proxy-maint being removed. An E-Mail to |
| 24 |
proxy-maint@g.o explaining that you've spoken to and are taking over |
| 25 |
proxying of the package would make sure we know what's happening. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Sam Jorna (wraeth) |
| 29 |
GnuPG Key: D6180C26 |
Archives