| 1 |
On 05/22/2017 03:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since they |
| 4 |
>> were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev maintainer in |
| 5 |
>> metadata) they are the de facto maintainers, and overrule everything else. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Just to clarify, the Proxy Maintainers project is not required to be |
| 8 |
> added to all packages maintained by non-Gentoo maintainers. If a Gentoo |
| 9 |
> developer is willing to work with and proxy commits for maintainer(s) |
| 10 |
> without commit access, Proxy Maintainers are happy to be removed. There |
| 11 |
> are several metadata.xml's in the tree with examples, including a few |
| 12 |
> for which you are one of the maintainers. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
That's nice. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Could proxy-maint as a team maybe try to agree on such things so that |
| 17 |
everyone is on the same page? It's a tiny bit annoying when the actions |
| 18 |
of some contradict the suggested rules of others, while appearing as a |
| 19 |
single team to the outside ... |
Archives