| 1 |
On 22/05/17 05:12, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 05/22/2017 03:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially |
| 5 |
>>> since they |
| 6 |
>>> were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev |
| 7 |
>>> maintainer in |
| 8 |
>>> metadata) they are the de facto maintainers, and overrule everything |
| 9 |
>>> else. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> Just to clarify, the Proxy Maintainers project is not required to be |
| 12 |
>> added to all packages maintained by non-Gentoo maintainers. If a Gentoo |
| 13 |
>> developer is willing to work with and proxy commits for maintainer(s) |
| 14 |
>> without commit access, Proxy Maintainers are happy to be removed. There |
| 15 |
>> are several metadata.xml's in the tree with examples, including a few |
| 16 |
>> for which you are one of the maintainers. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
> That's nice. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Could proxy-maint as a team maybe try to agree on such things so that |
| 21 |
> everyone is on the same page? It's a tiny bit annoying when the |
| 22 |
> actions of some contradict the suggested rules of others, while |
| 23 |
> appearing as a single team to the outside ... |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
You imply some level of organisation, and yet this /is/ Gentoo we're |
| 28 |
talking about .... |
Archives