| 1 |
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 00:52, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Yes, you will need to introduce a qt4 flag as upstreams |
| 3 |
> port packages to qt5, if they choose to also retain a qt4 frontend. |
| 4 |
You're trying to compare gtk to qt directly. They are not the same. |
| 5 |
gtk regards only the graphic library, qt is a library of utility functions |
| 6 |
too. Qt can be considered like gtk+glib, and that make things more complex. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
As I said, I'd rather see two flags, qt3 and qt4, to identify the two |
| 9 |
versions. A simpler alternative would be qt (defaults to 3) and qt4, but |
| 10 |
that's going to be confused on the long run to something similar to gtk. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ |
| 14 |
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE |
Archives