| 1 |
On 29/03/13 16:35, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> What do you have there? We cover bunch of those in pkg_postinst of udev |
| 4 |
>> already. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> After a bunch of cleanup (after which I have yet to detect any |
| 7 |
> problems), I have: |
| 8 |
> 70-persistent-cd.rules 70-persistent-net.rules |
| 9 |
> 80-net-name-slot.rules kino.rules local.rules |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Only media-video/kino actually claims one of those files. If I missed |
| 12 |
> an elog message somewhere, I'm ready for my flogging. :) |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Rich |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I fixed kino but I didn't revision bump for it. Waiting for something |
| 18 |
bigger to revbump it. If you re-emerge kino, the rule will move to |
| 19 |
/lib/udev/rules.d. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Those 70-* and 80-* are in udev pkg_postinst, this news item, |
| 22 |
everywhere... can all 3 be deleted if you haven't modified them yourself. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
So that leaves one... local.rules... dunno about that. I'm curious. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
- Samuli |
Archives