| 1 |
On 05/28/2010 12:09 AM, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 27 May 2010 22:52, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 05/27/2010 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> There is no libfoo. This bug is about libpng. Don't try to hide the |
| 5 |
>>> problem by renaming it. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> No, the bug is about Portage 2.2 and @preserved-libs feature. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> It was restricted by Arfrever before, then you unrestricted it and the |
| 10 |
>> (unrelated) bugspam continued because people wandered there by the |
| 11 |
>> $summary and lack of knowledge what the bug is for. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> Marked as duplicate of bug 286714 now. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Then what is the bug for problems caused by the libpng-1.4 update? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Cheers, |
| 18 |
> Ben |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
If you have real bugs to report, open one per one package and make it |
| 22 |
block the tracker 305095. At the moment, there's none. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
If you want to discuss about local upgrading problems, then use the |
| 25 |
forums. The ebuild already comes with the workaround script for the |
| 26 |
broken .la files, and revdep-rebuild is in the gentoolkit package. |
Archives