Archives
Archives
| From: | Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Fwd: [Bug 319061] media-libs/libfoo-1.4.2 update not handled by preserved-libs due to uninstall of older SLOT | ||
| Date: | Thu, 27 May 2010 21:09:16 | ||
| Message-Id: | AANLkTilZzWeKt7cn27XXtSDZg4zgivk_L0JNNLBGI6BK@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Fwd: [Bug 319061] media-libs/libfoo-1.4.2 update not handled by preserved-libs due to uninstall of older SLOT by Samuli Suominen |
||
| 1 | On 27 May 2010 22:52, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > On 05/27/2010 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 3 | >> There is no libfoo. This bug is about libpng. Don't try to hide the |
| 4 | >> problem by renaming it. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > No, the bug is about Portage 2.2 and @preserved-libs feature. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > It was restricted by Arfrever before, then you unrestricted it and the |
| 9 | > (unrelated) bugspam continued because people wandered there by the |
| 10 | > $summary and lack of knowledge what the bug is for. |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > Marked as duplicate of bug 286714 now. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Then what is the bug for problems caused by the libpng-1.4 update? |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Cheers, |
| 17 | Ben |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Fwd: [Bug 319061] media-libs/libfoo-1.4.2 update not handled by preserved-libs due to uninstall of older SLOT | Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> |