| 1 |
On Tue, 16 May 2006 16:15:49 +0100 |
| 2 |
Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> If noone has any strong reasonable objections, I'd like to add a |
| 5 |
> Paludis profile to the tree. This would use Paludis as the default |
| 6 |
> provider for virtual/portage (which is a less than ideal name, but |
| 7 |
> that is another discussion entirely), and provide ebuild devs with a |
| 8 |
> place where they can try out some of our profile enhancements should |
| 9 |
> they want to. It is worth noting on the last point that most of these |
| 10 |
> are long-standing Portage feature requests, at least some of which are |
| 11 |
> planned for inclusion in Portage at some point in the future. This |
| 12 |
> would allow devs access to them earlier, as a sort of testbed. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Why should this be handled differently than Gentoo/ALT projects? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Marius |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 22 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives