1 |
On Wednesday 11 June 2008 12:11:33 Brian Harring wrote: |
2 |
> Effectively, we've watched it essentially progress into a standard |
3 |
> that effectively only the paludis folk are adherent to (if in doubt, |
4 |
> ask portage folk, my sending this mail is indicative of the pkgcore |
5 |
> standpoint)- it's about time the council comment upon it in light of |
6 |
> the general view. |
7 |
|
8 |
Paludis isn't completely compliant either. Not sure what you're referring to |
9 |
about portage and pkgcore... if you mean kdebuild, then a) the Council has |
10 |
decided that that won't be part of the official approved version, and b) PMS |
11 |
only describes what kdebuild is, it doesn't say that any package manager has |
12 |
to implement it. As long as it's not being used in the main tree, that's up |
13 |
to the package manager maintainers, and what they think is most beneficial to |
14 |
their users. |
15 |
|
16 |
If you mean something else, feel free to file bugs, it could well be just an |
17 |
oversight. |
18 |
-- |
19 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |