Archives
Archives
| From: | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:13:10 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130109131225.GJ14383@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation? by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | On 09-01-2013 05:06:15 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 | > If we had a live cvs -> git sync, then I'd suggest that you migrate your |
| 3 | > scripts to use that instead. However, it looks like this one is not |
| 4 | > synced regularly (last sync was about 2 months ago): |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary |
| 7 | |
| 8 | This is "if" stuff. If it wasn't "if", we'd already done it, of course. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Fabian Groffen |
| 13 | Gentoo on a different level |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |