| 1 |
On Sunday 10 April 2005 7:18 pm, Jason Wever wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 18:43:13 +0200 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Christian Parpart <trapni@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Of course, we did not wanna push nearly-everyones little blindly |
| 6 |
> > executed `emerge -uvD world` into hell. But everyone makes mistakes, so |
| 7 |
> > including me. sorry for that, though, we got almost every complain |
| 8 |
> > fixed already. That's why we're requesting for testing, for being sure, |
| 9 |
> > going stable won't shoot anyone into his foot again. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Are there any plans for a non-branded version of this new Apache |
| 12 |
> configuration? It seems a bit opposite of the goal to try to make Apache |
| 13 |
> more compliant with how it is provided upsteam to be putting in a branded |
| 14 |
> default front page. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
current upstream page just sais "It works!". That's indeed not |
| 17 |
what we want to present the Gentoo Apache Users. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> Also if we're stuck with the branding, can we come up with a page that is |
| 20 |
> at least a little more professional looking or a little less like someone |
| 21 |
> trying to be witty? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
If you've a better page. email me. [I'm open to better proposals] |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Regards, |
| 26 |
Christian Parpart. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt |
| 30 |
03:30:23 up 18 days, 16:36, 2 users, load average: 0.08, 0.15, 0.16 |
Archives