Archives
Archives
| From: | "Olivier Crête" <tester@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits | ||
| Date: | Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:09:34 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1301004533.2896.3.camel@TesterTop4 | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits by Mike Frysinger |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 17:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 | > is there any reason we should allow people to commit unsigned |
| 3 | > Manifest's anymore ? generating/posting/enabling a gpg key is |
| 4 | > ridiculously easy and there's really no excuse for a dev to not have |
| 5 | > done this already. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I didn't know we still allowed that.. I guess the CVS server should just |
| 8 | reject unsigned Manifests.. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Olivier Crête |
| 13 | tester@g.o |
| 14 | Gentoo Developer |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> |