| 1 |
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:28:47 +0300 |
| 2 |
Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 03/06/14 16:20, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Ehm, no, version 0.9.23-r3 controls that with a systemd USE flag; |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> No, it doesn't. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Nevermind, `cvs up`-ed; heh, I don't understand how you've got to |
| 10 |
that change, I thought there only was a problem with 0.99.0? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> > in comparison, 0.99.0 mainly wants you to run it with systemd: |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> "mainly", as in, since 0.99.0 removed support for hibenate/suspend |
| 15 |
> in favour of systemd, the power/session managers need to integrate |
| 16 |
> their own hibernate/suspend support diffently. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Ah, right; thinking of MATE, I understand the 0.99.0 bit now. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> > 26 May 2014; Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> |
| 21 |
> > upower-0.99.0.ebuild: This release is mainly for use with |
| 22 |
> > sys-apps/systemd because upstream removed support for |
| 23 |
> > sys-power/pm-utils completely from git master. The 0.9 branch is |
| 24 |
> > for sys-power/pm-utils use. Adjust ebuild accordingly. |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> > Though I'm a bit confused why 0.99.0 doesn't list a systemd |
| 27 |
> > dependency; I thought it had one, but maybe it is in another |
| 28 |
> > package I'm unaware of. |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Outdated ChangeLog entry from March, those were the facts we dealt |
| 32 |
> back then, |
| 33 |
> only partly true anymore, consumers have evolved |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Which means that the situation I am assuming right now is outdated; so, |
| 36 |
if you don't mind feel free to highlight why 0.9.23-r3 needs systemd. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
With kind regards, |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 42 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 45 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 46 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives