| 1 |
On 03/06/14 16:20, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 2 |
>> This has already hit stable. The dependency on systemd is present in |
| 3 |
>> sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r3, which was just stablized. |
| 4 |
> Ehm, no, version 0.9.23-r3 controls that with a systemd USE flag; |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
No, it doesn't. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> in comparison, 0.99.0 mainly wants you to run it with systemd: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
"mainly", as in, since 0.99.0 removed support for hibenate/suspend |
| 11 |
in favour of systemd, the power/session managers need to integrate |
| 12 |
their own hibernate/suspend support diffently. |
| 13 |
For example, I'm using Xfce, OpenRC, UPower 0.99.0, pm-utils, Xfce 4.11+ |
| 14 |
and I have hibernate/suspend working just fine without systemd. |
| 15 |
And UPower is for much more than hibernate/suspend, it has dozens of |
| 16 |
features, so anykind of systemd dependency on 0.99.0 wouldn't make sense |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> 26 May 2014; Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> |
| 20 |
> upower-0.99.0.ebuild: This release is mainly for use with |
| 21 |
> sys-apps/systemd because upstream removed support for |
| 22 |
> sys-power/pm-utils completely from git master. The 0.9 branch is for |
| 23 |
> sys-power/pm-utils use. Adjust ebuild accordingly. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Though I'm a bit confused why 0.99.0 doesn't list a systemd dependency; |
| 26 |
> I thought it had one, but maybe it is in another package I'm unaware of. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Outdated ChangeLog entry from March, those were the facts we dealt back |
| 30 |
then, |
| 31 |
only partly true anymore, consumers have evolved |
Archives