| 1 |
El mar, 22-07-2014 a las 10:32 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand escribió: |
| 2 |
[...] |
| 3 |
> I find it somewhat curious that the difference between ~arch and |
| 4 |
> stable hasn't been brought up in this discussion yet. IMHO a user on |
| 5 |
> ~arch should expect a higher number of rebuilds, it _is_ after all |
| 6 |
> testing, whereby at the point it reaches stable, the deps are |
| 7 |
> hopefully more likely to be correct to begin with. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Does anyone have any insight into where these changes most often occur? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Well, I have seen multiple times of this kind of fixes being noticed by |
| 13 |
people running really old stable boxes. They notice them when they |
| 14 |
update to latest stable and, then, we need to fix depends raising the |
| 15 |
versions usually :/ |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Maybe this discussion should be focused on trying to think about how to |
| 18 |
standardize a way for distinguish between revision bumps needing full |
| 19 |
rebuild or only VDB updates :| |
Archives