Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kristian Fiskerstrand <kristian.fiskerstrand@××××××××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:33:43
Message-Id: 53CE219B.8030400@sumptuouscapital.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps by Michael Palimaka
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 On 07/22/2014 10:21 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
5 > On 07/22/2014 07:52 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
6 >>
7 >> To sum up: My vote is disable dynamic-deps. And I would be happy
8 >> to apply a patch that does this with the information I have
9 >> today.
10 >
11 > What a great way to kill the distro.
12 >
13 > I can already heat my house with the number of unnecessary rebuilds
14 > - I can't imagine how many people will be left once we have to
15 > needlessly rebuild libreoffice and half the tree every time someone
16 > makes some minor change. If developers can't revbump correctly to
17 > address the shortcomings of dynamic deps, why do we expect they
18 > will be able to do so for static deps?
19 >
20
21 I find it somewhat curious that the difference between ~arch and
22 stable hasn't been brought up in this discussion yet. IMHO a user on
23 ~arch should expect a higher number of rebuilds, it _is_ after all
24 testing, whereby at the point it reaches stable, the deps are
25 hopefully more likely to be correct to begin with.
26
27 Does anyone have any insight into where these changes most often occur?
28
29 - --
30 - ----------------------------
31 Kristian Fiskerstrand
32 Blog: http://blog.sumptuouscapital.com
33 Twitter: @krifisk
34 - ----------------------------
35 Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
36 fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
37 - ----------------------------
38 Ad astra per aspera
39 To the stars through thorns
40 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
41
42 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTziGbAAoJEPw7F94F4Tag61QP/iznpmFoc2jKO1Ex8fHEFURA
43 8D6mgzmkBW2OYWux8JnSfmS7WBrXvs0869Ey/dTgQeMWsdaauhFSqGUTL8k2s3pD
44 2NZUiNM9fBDGrVR589r0EX5jpPoylsq+ViYc/GtsWfUx8QZGRQOs75ecIB3G5dfS
45 eg15r/UI7Q5/vQv93s49Wl3EKWR8peqf46nsluXLMLZff80I6S2T0wGTZP9lMHd7
46 62Lwo4MxQEm+0XBqVNiY438qaF9eZBR8W14BPUwn2VWD0tL8CtNLiHZwLAAnYZrs
47 FE4mgAFUQu+cmJow4DAPkOxMqiqFHLlyh2wVKkxNVTp4fwYdLLeQZWLVLqF3Z7BR
48 cx75ocKCZmxcKqPA6gYj0hcl1W8uj7WyAwIOcYTzBBFf0eSaBzErtZ1WS7GVM/7z
49 1cauEo7DsDjiW2THZDkSy/zLn/O9XxRwMddqT7rT7IxDiy+V0n6AW4WD7mA/sAkd
50 YfEnQmZARF0hK7msiy88ScBK73NpmAmU04kVoIV1IUaKNjaahWi4sk8MDKbV/V7z
51 qnXvbQEejH9O9FbsY0ugWB6TL1imyfE3Va+Z63/nF3GFtO+XwJ3fqpT0VbDR3YBL
52 sYXNQ9CHRBoemIOaCLLGPJbkwAALS2/gt9aVsxHLE75efvuGAqj2Qa9g8Paj5WBH
53 Pq8eqnjDYOX02BBjSzSr
54 =sYA4
55 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>