| 1 |
Hi Kent, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 01:23:06 +1200 |
| 5 |
Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 22:29:29 -0400 |
| 8 |
> Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> > Setting RESTRICT="!test? ( test )" is generally sufficient. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> But that would require setting that virtually *everything* that has |
| 13 |
> both tests, and required dependencies for tests. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Oh, 2012 just called. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> Which, in my experience, is practically everything with tests. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> To the point it seems like that should be the *default* mechanic, not |
| 20 |
> a requirement that everyone pay not to have a randomly broken package. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
" |
| 23 |
[S]etting FEATUTES=-test USE=-test means rebuilding a lot of the |
| 24 |
installed packages. Instead, since USE=test is special already (it |
| 25 |
should only affect what happens in src_test(), right?) we might as |
| 26 |
well disable the test phase, tell the user in einfo, and be done with |
| 27 |
it. We could even write that to vdb so that on the next run, the |
| 28 |
package is re-emerged but with src_test() getting run properly this |
| 29 |
time. |
| 30 |
" |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417675 |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Kind regards, |
| 36 |
jer |
Archives