Archives
Archives
| From: | Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Improve description of USE=test | ||
| Date: | Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:23:32 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20180825012306.4a9b26a6@katipo2.lan | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Improve description of USE=test by Mike Gilbert |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 22:29:29 -0400 |
| 2 | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > Setting RESTRICT="!test? ( test )" is generally sufficient. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | But that would require setting that virtually *everything* that has |
| 7 | both tests, and required dependencies for tests. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Which, in my experience, is practically everything with tests. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | To the point it seems like that should be the *default* mechanic, not a |
| 12 | requirement that everyone pay not to have a randomly broken package. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Improve description of USE=test | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Improve description of USE=test | Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> |