Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <rhill@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 0/5] RFC: Patches for wxwidgets.eclass
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 03:30:33
Message-Id: 20160203213003.042f9276@tundra.gateway.pace.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 0/5] RFC: Patches for wxwidgets.eclass by Daniel Campbell
1 On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 17:07:48 -0800
2 Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > I see nothing wrong with discussing changes to parts of the tree that
5 > will affect other developers. Bugzilla is nice and all, but imo it's
6 > more of an AND thing instead of an OR thing. If the bug is already
7 > present, I see no real reason not to have a thread about it on g-dev.
8 > It keeps unrelated developers in the loop, as well, in the event that
9 > they come across weird eclass behavior or take on a project using a
10 > given eclass.
11 >
12 > I guess if eclass discussion is a problem, one could always add a rule
13 > to whatever they use to filter their mail.
14
15 I had thought that this got sent to gentoo-dev but not to wxwidgets, and I got
16 the impression that patches were being proposed for our eclass only here, where
17 I would have missed them (I don't read this list). I didn't notice until today
18 we were CC'd. I didn't see these come through on that alias, but I think my
19 mailer is eating messages again.
20
21 Sorry for the noise.
22
23
24 --