| 1 |
On 10/12/04 Beber wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> >>dev.gentoo.org:/space/distfiles-local |
| 6 |
> >> |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> > 3. developer uploads patch to dev.gentoo.org:/space/patches-local |
| 9 |
> > and |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> >I don't see a reason to separate patches from distfiles. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> I think my english is bad, tell if you don't understand what I want to |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> say :/ |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I think that it's not to separate patch from distfiles (a lot are |
| 20 |
> already avaible) but to have a emerge sync faster and less bandwith |
| 21 |
> consumer. |
| 22 |
> many many patch are on sync server, many are not apply due to proc |
| 23 |
> architecture or USE flag. |
| 24 |
> Thoses patch that are on distfiles server aren't necessary download |
| 25 |
> like on sync |
| 26 |
> I think that it can be a way to take for futur. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Like an other thing (for bandwith use) : if an update of a pacquet is |
| 29 |
> avaible : why download are the new sources instead of just a patch ? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
You're talking about something completely different, I'm just talking |
| 32 |
about the location on dev.gentoo.org, that has nothing to do wether a |
| 33 |
patch or a full tarball is used. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Marius |
Archives